Shared posts

07 Apr 20:51

Walmart will sell these violent books, but refuses to sell Ronda Rousey's autobiography

by rss@dailykos.com (Shaun King)
Chaz French

Fuck Walmart

Feb 28, 2015; Los Angeles, CA, USA; Ronda Rousey (red gloves) reacts after defeating Cat Zingano (not pictured) during their women's bantamweight title bout at UFC 184 at Staples Center. Rousey won in 14 seconds of the first round. Mandatory Credit: Jayne Kamin-Oncea-USA TODAY Sports - RTR4RL96
UFC Champion Ronda Rousey celebrating victory after a recent match
Come on, Walmart!

We were just slightly proud of you for asking the governor of Arkansas to veto the state's so-called religious liberty laws, but then you go and do this? According to Richard Johnson, writer for Page Six of the New York Post:

Walmart — the largest seller of guns and ammo in the country — is refusing to sell a book by cage-fighting cutie Ronda Rousey on the grounds that she’s too violent.
“My Fight/Your Fight” (due May 12 from Regan Arts) has pre-sold thousands of copies at Barnes & Noble, and the ravishing Rousey is already booked on “Good Morning America,” “CBS This Morning” and other shows. But the mouth-breathers at Walmart will be denied.
In addition to selling more guns and ammo than any retailer in the country, the following books are all listed on Walmart's Top 200 bestseller list:

American Sniper—In which Chris Kyle shoots and kills at least 160 men, women, and children.

Walking Dead Graphic Novels—In which heads are routinely blown off and faces regularly eaten off by zombies

Every book by Bill O'Reilly about killing someone—Patton, Jesus, Kennedy, etc.

10 Day Green Smoothie Cleanse—which is basically about violent butt explosions in the name of weight loss.

The point is this: Guns, which actually kill people, aren't too violent for Walmart, books about men who actually kill people with those guns aren't too violent for Walmart, but a book from an Olympic silver medalist who fights for sport is too violent?

Something's off. What do you think?

30 Mar 20:51

Imagine how it would feel like to be…

by rich
Chaz French

Well, the author is certainly no Lennon....

25 Mar 17:02

Every record label sucks dick

by rich

23 Mar 23:14

JAY-Z IS A PAGAN

by Neil

20 Mar 01:53

Terry Pratchett

Thank you for teaching us how big our world is by sharing so many of your own.
19 Mar 22:24

Anal lottery

by Alex Hughes

19 Mar 18:03

Report Clitterers

by David Wanless

16 Jun 01:45

Before 1970

by maesz
.
Ponder all this, my gentle snowflakes, before 1970, an American woman could not:
1. Keep her job if she was pregnant. Until the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in 1978, women could be fired from their workplace for being pregnant.
2. Report cases of sexual harassment in the workplace. The first time that a court recognized sexual harassment in the workplace was in 1977 and it wasn’t until 1980 that sexual harassment was officially defined by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
3. Be acknowledged in the Boston Marathon. Women could not don their running shoes until 1972!
4. Get a credit card. Until the Equal Credit Opportunity Act in 1974, women were not able to apply for credit. In 1975, the first women’s bank was opened. [Following my divorce in 1983, I had a fairly hard time getting a credit card in my own name. Of course, I was living in Oklahoma at the time.]
5. Refuse to have sex with her husband. The mid 70s saw most states recognize marital rape and in 1993 it became criminalized in all 50 states. Nevertheless, marital rape is still often treated differently to other forms of rape in some states even today.
6. Compete as a boxer in the Olympics. It wasn’t until the 2012 London Olympics that women could compete in boxing in the Olympics. This was marked with the amazing victory by Britain’s Nicola Adams.
7. Get a divorce with some degree of ease. Before the No Fault Divorce law in 1969, spouses had to show the faults of the other party, such as adultery, and could easily be overturned by recrimination.
8. Celebrate International Women’s Day. In 1980 President Carter declared one week in March to be National Women’s History Week, including International Women’s Day on March 8th.
9. Have a legal abortion in most states. The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 protected a woman’s right to abortion until viability. 
10. Read Ms. Magazine! Ms. was launched as a sample inset in New York Magazine in 1971.
07 May 02:19

Jury Duty: The Next Flex Thing

by Steve Silverman

Contents:

1. What Judges Won’t Tell You
2. Movie Plot
3. Campaign Objectives
4. Budget, Plan & Timeline
5. Keep in the Loop & Donate

Since 2002, Flex Your Rights’ films have taught you and yours how to “flex” your constitutional rights on the road, in your home, and on the streets. (33 million YouTube views later, I think we covered ‘em pretty well!)

Now it’s time to flex our rights in the courtroom — as members of a jury.

Jury Holdout

The Jury, by Norman Rockwell

If you’re registered to vote, you’ll probably receive a jury summons in the mail at some point in your life. Most of us try to avoid service by chucking the summons in the trash or making excuses to be released. But that’s a huge mistake, because jury duty might be the most important and powerful thing you can do as a citizen to stop abusive government power.

So if you think like I do that politicians pass too many laws criminalizing too many victimless acts, this movie is for you.

If you’re fed up with bullying prosecutors who punish political activists and whistleblowers, this movie is for you.

And if you think that the War on Drugs is a trillion-dollar fiasco that destroys civil liberties and fuels the over-incarceration of poor people of color, then this movie is definitely for you.

What They Won’t Tell You

If you’re ever on a jury in a marijuana case, for example, you may vote “Not Guilty” — even if you think the defendant actually smoked pot, or sold it to another consenting adult.

As a juror, you have this power under the Bill of Rights. And if you exercise it, you become part of a proud tradition of American jurors who helped make our laws fairer.

This constitutional doctrine is called “jury nullification,” and it guarantees that jurors can never be punished for their verdicts.

Nobody knows more about this topic than Paul Butler. He’s a former federal prosecutor, author, and a Georgetown University law professor. He’s perhaps the most prolific jury nullification advocate of our time, and he’s starring in our new movie!

Paul Butler

Starring Prof. Paul Butler

Movie Plot

The story begins with a young woman being interviewed by a reporter. We learn that she did something extraordinary while serving as a juror in a high-profile medical marijuana case.

As the narrative unfolds, our hero flashes back to an inspirational lecture she had with Prof. Butler who guides her through the three thresholds she’ll face as a juror.

Threshold #1: Jury Selection
Watching our hero get on the jury is the first real test. Jury selection itself is intimidating. A judge sitting above you. Lawyers grilling you. And a room full of people watching you. All while under oath. There’s nothing quite like it.

You’ll see how judges, prosecutors and even defense attorneys weed-out jurors. But you’ll learn that it’s possible to answer their questions truthfully and improve your odds of getting picked.

Threshold #2: In the Jury Room
The second threshold for our hero happens in a tiny deliberation room. Twelve jurors. 12 personalities. And they all want you to vote their way. But you’ll stick to your guns and vote your conscience, no matter how much peer pressure they bring to bear.

Threshold #3: The Judge
And then our hero reaches the final threshold. The judge. Once it’s clear that the jury is at an impasse, the judge will try to force a verdict. You might be all alone, but you will stick to your guns and vote your conscience.

Saving Lives & Changing Laws

The film will be the centerpiece of a permanent social media campaign to empower millions of citizens to save lives and change bad laws. Each and every new “not guilty” verdict sends a powerful message to police, prosecutors, judges and lawmakers that “We the people” will no longer tolerate policies that violate our American values of liberty and justice for all.

Budget, Plan & Timeline

We are working to raise $550K to produce a feature-length film. Long story short, this is what we need to pull off a solid low-budget movie with minimum quality levels American audiences are accustom to and film festivals will accept.

We’ve received seed funding from the Drug Policy Alliance and are approaching additional foundations. We’ll also launch a Kickstarter crowdfunding campaign in the summer of 2014 with a goal of raising $110,000 toward the $550K production budget. Production is scheduled to begin in summer of 2015. We expect to release the completed film by early 2016.

Keep in the Loop & Donate

In the coming weeks and months I’ll provide more details. But in the meantime your early support helps aid my writing, research, and outreach to grant-giving foundations.

Speaking of foundation grants, they take lots of time and effort to secure. (And only a precious few fund film.) So every dollar I can raise from you — my most reliable givers — provides more proof that we have a groundswell of support needed to make this project succeed.

Also, many of you are already jury nullification experts who have something to teach me. If you’ve got a short story to share about your own jury experience or you’re a lawyer or defendant with personal insights or ideas, please contact me directly or post a comment to Flex Your Rights’ Facebook page.

I’m excited to hear what you think!

Steve Silverman, Founder & Executive Director

07 May 01:38

RSS is dead! Long live RSS! An Interview with The Old Reader

by Dan Patterson
Chaz French

My good friend Dan interviews the folks behind our new home here at The Old Reader.

RSS is dead! Long live RSS! This interview was recorded the week after Google announced the death of beloved feed parsing app, Google Reader. The headlines regarding Reader’s demise  have been predictably and wonderfully hyperbolic. Elena Bulygina and Anton Tolchanov, two of the three co-founders of The Old Reader, help us make sense of a post-Google Reader world. Props to @ChazFrench for […]
01 Apr 06:25

Obama Promotes Ambitious Plan to Overhaul Nation’s Infrastructure

by By PETER BAKER
Declaring, “Let’s get started rebuilding America,” President Obama promoted a merger of tax breaks, loans and private investment to generate money for projects.

01 Apr 05:37

Literally separated at birth

by Jason Kottke

Twinsters is a project on Kickstarter by a pair of women who look very similar, were both born in South Korea, both born on November 19, 1987, both adopted three months after birth, and have never met. They're raising funds to make a documentary about their first meeting and to test their DNA to see if they are twins.

On February 21, 2013, Samantha, an American actor living in Los Angeles, received a message via Facebook that would drastically change her life. It was from Anaïs, a French fashion design student living in London. Anaïs' friends viewed a KevJumba YouTube video featuring Samantha. They were immediately blown away by the identical appearance of Samantha & Anaïs. After a few light Google stalking sessions, Anaïs & her friends discovered that both girls were born on November 19, 1987 & adopted shortly after. Anaïs knew immediately that it was possible for Samantha to be her biological twin sister & reached out to her through Twitter & Facebook.

(thx, bethany)

27 Mar 03:52

1910s Paris color photos redone in contemporary Paris

by Jason Kottke

In past few months, I linked to two collections of color photos of Paris taken in the 1910s and 1920s under the direction of Albert Kahn.

Albert Kahn Paris

Recently Rue89 sent photographer Audrey Cerdan to recapture some of those old scenes in modern day Paris and knocked up an interface so that you can slide back and forth between the old and current photos. In some of the pairs of photos, pharmacies, tabacs, and boulangeries are in the same places. (thx, christophe)

Tags: Albert Kahn   Audrey Cerdan   early color photography   Paris
25 Mar 19:33

New. Daft! PUNK!!! ALBUMMMMMMM!!!!!

by Jason Kottke
Chaz French

YES!!!!!!!!

Daft Punk is coming out with a new album called Random Access Memories. It's out on May 21 but you can preorder on iTunes. Here's a brief ad for the album:

Tags: Daft Punk   music
24 Mar 20:35

Hexagonal rocks

by Jason Kottke

This is an Icelandic waterfall called Litlanesfoss and the naturally occurring rock formation is columnar jointed basalt.

Litlanesfoss

The columns form due to stress as the lava cools. The lava contracts as it cools, forming cracks. Once the crack develops it continues to grow. The growth is perpendicular to the surface of the flow. Entablature is probably the result of cooling caused by fresh lava being covered by water. The flood basalts probably damned rivers. When the rivers returned the water seeped down the cracks in the cooling lava and caused rapid cooling from the surface downward. The division of colonnade and entablature is the result of slow cooling from the base upward and rapid cooling from the top downward.

One of the coolest things I have ever seen. Looks totally fake, like they built it for Fractal Falls in Polygon Gorge at Disneyland or something. Giants Causeway in Northern Ireland looks amazing as well. Check out several similar formations from around the world.

Tags: geology
24 Mar 20:23

Day Around The Bay: Foie Gras Lawsuit

by Brock Keeling
Day Around The Bay: Foie Gras Lawsuit Today in Day Around the Bay: Draw Something revamp, horrible Steubenville rape verdict reactions, foie gras lawsuit, the return of W. Kamau Bell, aux FBI agents, and more. [ more › ]

Add to digg Email this Article Add to Facebook Add to Google
24 Mar 20:07

Kale, Mushroom, and Cheddar Bake

by Elise
Chaz French

This looks good and easy.

Kale Mushroom Cheddar Bake on Simply Recipes

Are you a lover of kale? Bread? Cheese? Mushrooms? Then you are likely to love this recipe from Jennie Perillo as much as I do. It’s basically a simplified strata of sorts, a casserole layering thin slices of rustic ciabatta bread with sautéed kale, mushrooms, and onions, and cheddar cheese, soaked with milk and egg, and then baked until bubbly and browned. It’s the ultimate kale lover’s comfort food. The recipe is from Jennie’s new cookbook, Homemade with Love: Simple Scratch Cooking from In Jennie’s Kitchen, a beautiful book with photographs by Penny De Los Santos, heart warming prose, and tummy warming recipes for the home cook.

Continue reading "Kale, Mushroom, and Cheddar Bake" »

21 Mar 21:57

The Weirdest Thing on the Internet Tonight: Apparition

by Andrew Tarantola
Click here to read The Weirdest Thing on the Internet Tonight: Apparition In a stunning display of interpretive dance, Apparition answers the burning question: "What choreography emerges when software is your partner?" This interactive media performance was created and directed by Klaus Obermaier with help from the Ars Electronica Futurelab and performed by Rob Tannion. More »
17 Mar 04:13

FUCK CREAM CAKES

by John

16 Mar 03:15

I'm Sorry My HIV Offends You

by David Duran
Chaz French

I want people to read this, and to get an idea of what it's like to be HIV+ and single. I don't want sympathy, I want understanding, I want knowledge and I want you to make other people understand because people need to be kinder to each other.

It's easy to be an ass on mobile dating apps because you can hide behind a cell phone. It's also easy to get your feelings hurt if you don't quickly come to terms with the fact that guys online can be vicious. Most men online put it all out there and can be so upfront about what they do and don't like. Some even go as far as to flat out say, "no fems," or "no Asians," or "no fatties." Apparently, honesty can show how ugly someone truly is on the inside. But what I find most offensive is the treatment of HIV-positive guys who are online looking for most likely the same thing you are. "I'm clean, UB2." -The most ignorant statement most commonly found online.

I get that we all have preferences and I understand that you may think it's easier to just put it all out there, but the truth is, you are offensive and your tag lines are offensive. I get it, not everyone is up to date on HIV education and not everyone is OK with dating or hooking up with someone who is positive. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that. It's the delivery in which you choose to respond. Each time I am in a good conversation with someone on one of these apps and it turns potentially sexual, I gear up for the question I ultimately know is coming. On a side note, I appreciate the fact that most guys are asking about status. But what do most of these guys online want to hear after asking? Are they just asking to ask and get it out of the way, or do they truly want an honest answer?

It's almost become robotic for some to just ask and get the question out of the way. But how do you know if your potential partner is telling the truth or just going along with you to get into bed with you? It would be so easy for someone to just say, "yea, me too." Is that all it takes for you to trust them? Are you that desperate to get undressed that a few simple words you know damn well could be complete bull are enough to persuade you? What is most fascinating to me are the responses from these sex seekers to those who are honest with them.

Disclosing to anyone that you are HIV-positive is not an easy task. It takes courage and at times a thick skin, especially when dating. I know that personally, when chatting with guys online, the moment that question is asked, I cringe and tell myself that it's better to just get it out of the way and move on if he's not OK with it. I'll usually respond quickly and then log off for a few moments to continue my pep talk to myself before returning to the conversation. At times I return and there is no response. It's like my honesty doesn't merit a response or even a "no thanks." But what infuriates me are the guys who just automatically block you. I'm sorry, did I say something so offensive to you that you felt you needed to block me? Is my HIV status that repulsive to you? Or are you just a selfish coward who can't properly end a conversation in a courteous way?

It's hurtful when gay men act the way they do online. I'm proud of myself each time I am upfront, honest and disclose my status. It's not an easy thing to do, but I have come to terms with who I am, and I am not ashamed. I don't even feel the need to defend myself or give excuses for my status. Why should I? But it does cut deep when your own community casts you out and looks down upon you. So quickly they forget their history and so quickly they turn a cheek to their brother who was once in their shoes. It's an unfortunate ignorance that plagues our community and as much as I am hurt, angered and disgusted by the treatment I receive at times from my brothers, I hope that they never are faced with my situation.

For My Fellow HIV'ers
On the positive, pun intended, there is an online and soon to be mobile dating app geared specifically for guys like us. Volttage.com offers the same as all the rest with no disclosure needed.